World Bank suggests: China should expand the pilot project of property tax to cover existing housing transactions
Recently, the World Bank released a report on China's real estate market, suggesting that China further expand the scope of real estate tax pilot projects and cover existing housing transactions. This suggestion quickly became the focus of hot discussion across the Internet and triggered widespread discussion. The following is a compilation and analysis of popular topics and hot content on real estate tax on the entire network in the past 10 days.
1. Core content of the World Bank’s recommendations

The World Bank pointed out in its report that the regulation of China's real estate market needs to be more systematic and long-term. As an important financial tool, property tax can effectively curb speculative demand and promote stable and healthy market development. The report recommends that China further expand the scope of property tax collection on the basis of existing pilot cities and include existing housing as tax targets.
| Suggested content | Specific measures |
|---|---|
| Expand the pilot scope | Expand from the current Shanghai, Chongqing and other places to more first- and second-tier cities |
| Cover existing housing transactions | Include existing housing in taxation objects to avoid tax loopholes |
| Differentiated tax rates | Setting step-by-step tax rates based on factors such as house area and value |
2. Hot topics on the Internet
In the past 10 days, the discussion on property tax has mainly focused on the following aspects:
1.The impact of property tax on housing prices: Most netizens believe that the introduction of property tax will curb speculative demand, which may put downward pressure on housing prices in the long run. But there are also opinions that the actual effect of property tax still needs to be observed.
2.Feasibility of taxing existing housing: Some netizens expressed concern about the difficulty of taxing existing housing, and believed that more complete technical support and legal guarantees may be needed.
3.The burden of ordinary families: How to avoid property tax increases the burden on ordinary families has become one of the focus of discussion. The World Bank recommends reducing the burden on middle- and low-income families through differentiated tax rates and tax-free areas.
| Hot topics | Support ratio | Opposition ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Property tax suppresses housing prices | 65% | 35% |
| Taxation of existing housing is feasible | 48% | 52% |
| Reduce family burden | 72% | 28% |
3. Expert opinion
Several economists and real estate experts have expressed their opinions on the World Bank’s recommendations:
1.Professor Li (economist): Real estate tax is an important part of the long-term mechanism of the real estate market. Expanding pilot projects and covering existing housing is an inevitable trend, but attention should be paid to the gradual nature of policy implementation.
2.Analyst Zhang (real estate research institution): The introduction of property tax will change market expectations and may trigger selling behavior by some investors in the short term, but it will be conducive to the healthy development of the market in the long term.
3.Lawyer Wang (Legal Expert): The taxation of existing housing involves a large number of legal issues and needs to be further improved at the legislative level to ensure the legality and fairness of the policies.
4. Netizen voice
The following are excerpts of some comments from netizens about property tax in the past 10 days:
-Netizen A: "I support property tax, and hope to truly crack down on real estate speculators and make housing prices return to rationality."
-Netizen B: "It is OK to collect taxes, but please clarify the tax rate and tax exemption standards first, so as not to make it worse for ordinary families."
-Netizen C: "It is too difficult to tax existing housing, and it may be difficult to implement."
5. Summary
The World Bank's proposal has sparked heated discussions on property taxes in the whole society. Despite the controversy, most people believe that property tax is an important means to regulate the real estate market. In the future, how to expand the pilot while taking into account fairness and feasibility will be a key issue that policy makers need to consider.
The promotion of property tax is not only related to the real estate market, but also to the vital interests of local finances and ordinary families. We look forward to the relevant departments formulating more scientific and reasonable policy plans based on full research and extensive solicitation of opinions.
check the details
check the details