Why not add rune pages? ——Analysis of recent hot topics among players
Recently, the discussion about "rune pages" in the "League of Legends" player community has heated up again. Many players question why the official no longer provides free rune page expansion, and some returning players even find that the old version of the rune page is locked. This article will analyze this issue from the three dimensions of historical background, player feedback and official strategy based on the hot data of the entire network in the past 10 days.
1. Popularity data of related topics across the entire network (June 1st - June 10th)
| platform | Amount of related topics | highest heat index | Keywords TOP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12,800+ | 856,000 | The rune page disappears/new version of runes/benefits for old players | |
| Tieba | 5,200+ | 321,000 | Rune page bug/gold coin compensation/system simplification |
| NGA | 980+ | 183,000 | Not enough default page/professional player configuration/nostalgic server |
| Tik Tok | 3,500+ | 764,000 | Rune page comparison/beginner tutorial/Krypton gold complaints |
2. The evolution history of the rune system
The 2018 rune system redesign was a source of controversy:
1.Old system (pre-2017): 30 pages can be customized, gold coins/points are required to unlock
2.Transition period (S8 preseason): 5 basic pages will be distributed for free, and old pages will be converted at a 1:1 ratio.
3.Current system (2023): Adopt default mode, theoretically unlimited pages (manual adjustment required)
3. Statistics of core demands of players
| Appeal type | Proportion | Typical remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Restore old version of pages | 42% | "The 20 pages I saved before are gone" |
| Add default slot | 35% | "Playing with 10 heroes requires constant coverage." |
| Clarify compensation plan | 18% | "At least the gold coins originally purchased for the page will be refunded." |
| other | 5% | "Request to open classic server" |
4. Analysis of official attitudes
From recent designer interviews and patch notes:
1.System Simplification Principle: I think the new version of "Rune + Talent" two-in-one is easier to use.
2.technical limitations: The old client code is difficult to be compatible with the old rune page
3.business considerations: New payment points such as passes have replaced rune page income
5. Horizontal comparison with other MOBA games
| Game name | Configuration saving method | Maximum number of pages | Unlock conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| League of Legends | Cloud preset | No upper limit | Manual save |
| DOTA2 | local configuration file | unlimited | Edit text |
| King of Glory | Program page | 50 pages | level unlock |
6. Solution suggestions
1.compromise: Issue exclusive commemorative pages to old players (such as +5 pages for former S8 players)
2.Function optimization: Added "Smart Coverage Reminder" and "Batch Export" functions
3.compensation plan: Return blue essence based on historical purchase records
The essence of the current dispute isGame simplification needs and core player habitsconflict. As the mobile game version goes online, the in-depth customization function of the PC game may continue to weaken, but only by properly handling the issues left over from history can players' trust be maintained. What are your thoughts on the rune page issue? Welcome to discuss in the comment area.
check the details
check the details
en
